I’M SEARCHING A HEALTHIER, LONGER LIFE. Between the clanking of iron at the gym and the rhythmic pounding of running shoes on pavement, I find myself at a crossroads. We discuss seeking longevity today: strength training vs cardio.
Two of my fitness pillars, cardiovascular activity and strength training, each have their own throne in the realm of longevity.
I consider this topic a lot as I get ready for my Master’s bodybuilding competition in April 2024.
This essay will examine the long-running controversy, looking at the advantages of strength and aerobic exercise and trying to figure out what the key is to living a longer, more energetic life.
The Cardiovascular Adventure
I’ll start with the thrilling realm of aerobics.
Running, cycling, and swimming are examples of cardiovascular workouts that are well-known for strengthening the heart and lungs.
My preference is to stroll, with the occasional run thrown in.
Strong cardiovascular function is frequently linked to a lower risk of heart attacks, strokes, and other cardiovascular problems.
Many research has demonstrated the beneficial effects of cardiovascular exercise on lifespan.
Reduced Mortality with Aerobic Activity
Engaging in regular, scheduled physical activity improves your health and overall well-being.
However, what level of intense or moderate exercise is required to reduce our chance of dying young?
That figure is defined in Circulation research, which also offers recommendations for the amount of physical activity required to preserve health and increase fitness.
The study participants who engaged in 150–300 minutes per week of long-term, intense physical activity during their leisure time, along with 300–600 minutes per week of long-term leisure time, were able to achieve virtually the maximum decrease in premature death.
